US and China clashed at the UN over the Panama Canal, with disputes on control, sovereignty, and security risks to global trade routes.

On August 11, 2025, at a United Nations Security Council session, the United States and China engaged in a tense exchange over the Panama Canal. The U.S. argued that China’s expanding role in the canal’s operations could endanger international trade and security. In response, China dismissed the accusations, saying they were simply a cover for Washington to try to gain control of the route. Chairing the meeting, Panama’s President José Raúl Mulino stressed that the canal remains neutral and fully under Panama’s sovereignty. U.S. Ambassador Dorothy Shea raised concerns about Beijing’s influence in port facilities and related infrastructure. China’s U.N. Ambassador Fu Cong rejected these concerns, backed Panama’s authority over the canal, and criticized the U.S. stance as unfounded and destabilizing. The dispute reflected deeper geopolitical friction between the two powers, following earlier American efforts to limit Chinese involvement in canal-linked port operations.

On Monday, August 11, 2025, during a meeting of the United Nations Security Council, the United States and China faced off over the Panama Canal.

The United States said China’s growing role in the canal could put world trade and safety at risk.

China replied that these claims were just an excuse for America to try to take control of the waterway.

Panama’s President José Raúl Mulino, who led the meeting, said the canal is neutral and fully under Panama’s ownership.

U.S. Ambassador Dorothy Shea voiced worries about China’s strong presence in the canal’s ports and infrastructure.

China’s U.N. Ambassador Fu Cong rejected these remarks and supported Panama’s right to manage the canal.

Fu Cong also called the U.S. position baseless and harmful to stability.

The exchange showed rising tensions between the two countries over important global transport routes.

It also followed earlier U.S. actions to challenge Chinese involvement in port operations linked to the canal.

BACKGROUND

The Panama Canal has long been a critical global trade route, linking the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans and enabling faster shipping between major markets. Historically controlled by the United States until 1999, the canal’s management was handed over to Panama, which has maintained its sovereignty and neutrality since. In recent years, China has increased its presence in the region by investing in port facilities and infrastructure near the canal, raising concerns in Washington about Beijing’s growing influence over this strategic waterway. The U.S. views China’s involvement as a potential threat to global maritime security and trade stability. This has led to heightened diplomatic tensions, especially as the U.S. pushes back against Chinese investments and seeks to maintain its own influence in the Americas. The dispute at the United Nations reflects these broader geopolitical struggles, with Panama caught in the middle as it balances its relationships with both global powers.

QUESTIONS:

We do appreciate if you would answer the following question/s with reference of question number/s in the comments section:

Q. No. 1 How much economic leverage does China actually hold over the Panama Canal?

Q. No. 2 What specific agreements exist between Panama and Chinese companies operating near the canal?

Q. No. 3 Could the United States take concrete steps to limit China’s role in canal operations?

Q. No. 4 How might Panama respond if tensions between the US and China escalate further?

Q. No. 5 What impact could this dispute have on shipping costs and global trade routes?

Q. No. 6 Are other countries or international bodies quietly taking sides in this conflict?

Q. No. 7 What historical precedents influence the US stance on control of the Panama Canal today?

Stay connected with us for more updates:

#TrendingNow #TopStory #LiveUpdate #BreakingNews #NewsAlert #JustIn #UrgentNews #BigNews #Headlines #FlashNews #MajorNews #PanamaCanal #USChinaTensions #GlobalTrade #UNSecurityCouncil #Geopolitics #ChinaUSConflict #TradeSecurity